<script type="text/javascript"> var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); </script> <script type="text/javascript"> try{ var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {} // these are (ruh-roh) globals. You could wrap in an // immediately-Invoked Function Expression (IIFE) if you wanted to... var currentTallest = 0, currentRowStart = 0, rowDivs = new Array(); function setConformingHeight(el, newHeight) { // set the height to something new, but remember the original height in case things change el.data("originalHeight", (el.data("originalHeight") == undefined) ? (el.height()) : (el.data("originalHeight"))); el.height(newHeight); } function getOriginalHeight(el) { // if the height has changed, send the originalHeight return (el.data("originalHeight") == undefined) ? (el.height()) : (el.data("originalHeight")); } function columnConform() { // find the tallest DIV in the row, and set the heights of all of the DIVs to match it. $('.subcontent .post').each(function() { // "caching" var $el = $(this); var topPosition = $el.position().top; if (currentRowStart != topPosition) { // we just came to a new row. Set all the heights on the completed row for(currentDiv = 0 ; currentDiv < rowDivs.length ; currentDiv++) setConformingHeight(rowDivs[currentDiv], currentTallest); // set the variables for the new row rowDivs.length = 0; // empty the array currentRowStart = topPosition; currentTallest = getOriginalHeight($el); rowDivs.push($el); } else { // another div on the current row. Add it to the list and check if it's taller rowDivs.push($el); currentTallest = (currentTallest < getOriginalHeight($el)) ? (getOriginalHeight($el)) : (currentTallest); } // do the last row for (currentDiv = 0 ; currentDiv < rowDivs.length ; currentDiv++) setConformingHeight(rowDivs[currentDiv], currentTallest); }); return true; } </script>

Thanks to our sponsors

A publication of the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance

Federal PUPS Bill a Threat to Sporting Dog Owners

Posted on March 15, 2013

Animal rights organizations are once again pushing federal legislation that would greatly expand the number of dog owners regulated under the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA).  The bills H.R. 847, sponsored by Reps. James Gerlach (R-PA) and Lois Capps (D-CA), and S. 395, sponsored by Sens. Richard Durbin (D-IL) and David Vitter (R-LA), are more commonly known as PUPS – the Puppy Uniform Protection and Safety Act.

These bills would regulate dog owners who sell more than 50 dogs in a year.

As far as dog owners are concerned, the AWA is meant to regulate large-scale wholesale dog breeders and sellers.  Large wholesale breeders that fall under the AWA must comply with federal regulations, including licensing and inspections by the United States Department of Agriculture through their Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).

The AWA regulations were written with these large dog breeders in mind and were not designed or intended for sporting dog or hobby breeders.  That’s why hunting dog owners and most other hobby breeders that sell dogs at retail (directly to the public) are currently exempt from the AWA’s regulation.

“These bills would greatly expand the scope of the AWA and move it beyond regulating large wholesale dog breeders,” said Evan Heusinkveld, U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance Director of Government Affairs.  “It would also set the stage for animal rights organizations to come back and lower the threshold until sporting dog owners who sell just one or two litters of dogs a year are regulated by the federal government.  They won’t quit until it is almost impossible to breed or own sporting dogs.”

The legislation is being pushed by the Humane Society of the United States and other animal rights organizations.  These groups are also advocating for similar legislation in every state.  If animal rights groups are successful law abiding sporting dog and hobby breeders would be subject to the costly rules and regulations from both the federal government and at the state level.

“This two track approach is intended to regulate sporting dog kennels and hobby breeders out of existence,” explained Heusinkveld.   “Because these folks do not operate kennels exclusively for selling dogs, they do not have the revenue stream to keep up with restrictions meant for large scale operations.”

Take Action!  Sportsmen should contact their U.S. Congressman and U.S. Senators and ask them to oppose H.R. 847 and S. 395.  Visit USSA’s Legislative Action Center to find your representatives’ contact information.

Share


Discussion

Wolf Management Under Attack in Minnesota

In their ever-expanding quest to stop state management of a rapidly proliferating wolf population, anti-hunting forces have returned to the Minnesota statehouse with a series of bills designed to stop …

Read More

California Sportsmen’s Coalition Formed

The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA) is excited to announce the formation of the Al Taucher Conservation Coalition (ATCC) developed to educate and inform California citizens on conservation issues. Coalition members comprise …

Read More

American Heritage Girls Host First Event in Florida

As spring arrives, the Trailblazer Adventure Program is ramping up for another great season as events are kicking off in full force. The program, launched by U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance Foundation …

Read More

Nebraska Governor Stands Up For Sportsmen, Veto’s Hunting Ban

Today, Nebraska Governor Dave Heineman vetoed a bill that would have banned Mountain lion hunting in Nebraska. The measure, LB 671, sought to remove the authority of the state’s wildlife management …

Read More

Join Our FREE Sentry Program

Sign up to receive the official membership newsletter of the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance and U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation.

Join Now

Support Your Passion

Donate Today

Keep the Tradition Alive

Speak Out About Your Rights